I went to see this movie last night, so I could see the visual effects created by my old pals from Prime Focus, where I used to work last year around this time. I also did some trivial research for the effects to be created in Love Story 2050.
I am happy to say that my buddies did me proud... those were the best effects I've ever seen in a Bollywood movie. The matte paintings done in part by Yatin Mahambrey, modelling done in part by Akash Shivdasani, and the compositing done by Shaily Swarnkar were all superb. And I'm sure a good amount of credit goes to Merzin Tavaria, my ex boss and VFX Supe on the movie. Oh, and the costume styling in the future wasn't too bad either.
But it's a terrible shame that the first half set in present day Australia, was so boring, that you almost want to leave. The overacting is palpable, in sticking with the Bollywood formula. The characters are so simplified, you don't really want to empathize with them. Other questions that occurred to me during the movie were:
Why does the U Ya character of Boman Irani have to look like Albert Einstein?
Why does the villain character's energy ball weapon look suspiciously like Gandalph's in the Lord of the Rings trilogy?
Why was the Harman-asks-Priyanka-out-on-a-date scene copied from the Notebook movie, where Ryan Gosling's character threatens to jump off the ferris wheel (substituted here for a roller coaster) if Rachel McAdams character refuses to go on a date with him?
Couldn't the production team conceptualize better robots? Both robots were really stiff. After all, if they want us to believe Bombay has flying motorbikes and underwater homes in its future, wouldn't the robots be able to walk normally?
And most of all -- how could they so blatantly imitate Hrithik Roshan's dance moves?
Friday, July 4, 2008
Friday, June 13, 2008
In India, the State still gets away with injustice - locking up political filmmakers!
This is an appeal to you to actively campaign for the freedom for the film-maker Ajay T.G, who was recently arrested in Bhilai under the Chhattisgarh Special Public Safety Act (like Dr. Binayak Sen) as also on charges on sedition!
Ajay, who would be about 35, hails originally from Kerala. Coming from a very ordinary family, he has been involved in CPI politics and is still a postbearer of the local youth federation. He learned film-making at "Jan Darshan" an effort of journalist Lalit Surjan (of Deshbandhu fame) to train local youth in the audio-visual media.
As a research assistant of the well known sociologist Jonathan Parry of the London School of Economics, Ajay made several films on the interface of caste and class among the permanent workmen of the Bhilai Steel Plant, which were widely appreciated
As a member of PUCL, he had the courage to accompany several fact finding teams including into fake encounters, and capture on film the statements of victims.(Presumably it is this activity of Ajay's that is being dubbed "sedition"?)
He had started a foundation called "Drk Sakshi" (Eye witness) to make socially relevant films and under this banner he made a number of films for various people's movements and organisations. For instance "Phool Nahi Chingari Hai" a film capturing the 8th March programme of the Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha, and a film on the rich diversity of rice varieties in Chhatisgarh for social organisation Rupantar. Ajay had also made an interesting film on the lathicharge on the Honda workers at Gurgaon in the wider context of liberalisation based on TV footage, which proved invaluable material for educating workers. Just before his arrest he was planning a documentary on displacement.
Ajay also ran an informal education centre for women and children in one of the bastis of Bhilai. This unassuming, sensitive and courageous young man was the much loved "Bhaiyya", and always there for the people of Dabrapara - taking a cancer patient to hospital, intervening on the behalf of the girl children against patriardchal attitudes, helping to deal with insensitive authorities....
In the year 2004 Ajay had accompanied a group of researchers to Dantewada and there his camera was snatched away from him by youthful villagers, possibly frontal organisation members of Maoists. Later an unknown young man came to him and offered that the camera or its cost would be returned and asked him to write down information about the make of the camera and its cost. Ultimately neither the camera nor its cost were returned to him, but it is possibly the seizure of some such letter that forms the flimsy basis that Ajay was the member of a the banned organisation CPI (Maoist). It is pertinent that the Act under which this organisation was banned itself came into existence in April 2006.
Of course the real crime committed by Ajay was that he insisted on standing in solidarity with Binayak Sen even after his arrest. He made a film on Dr. Sen, ironically called "Anjam". In a recent hearing he had been unduly harassed when a pocket knife (cum nail cutter cum corkskrew - one of those handy kits) was found in his rucksack while entering the court. This was splashed in the media as a "weapon"! Interestingly the so-called "incriminating letter" is said to have been seized in January. It took the police 5 months to decide whether or not to book Ajay, there could be no greater evidence that there is no evidence!!
Be that is it may, Ajay is now in a jail. Clearly the Chhattisgarh government is hell bent on clearly giving the message: "Speak about the conditions in Bastar and you go to jail. Of course we know you are not Maoists, but so what .... rot in jail till you prove your innocence!"
And its not only Ajay. The journalists who tried to expose atrocities of the police or Salwa Judum were sacked, bashed up or otherwise threatened. Many TV journalists had their cameras and footage snatched away. Out of the 52 detainees under the Chhattisgarh Act, 2 are journalists.
If you think you can take up the campaign for the release of Ajay, we can send a detailed profile, a list of films and selected CDs etc.
The campaign of doctors in favour of Dr. Binayak Sen has gone far beyond the borders of Chhattisgarh, and even India, and has forced them to think deeply over their Hippocratic Oath which tells them to "treat a patient irrespective of political affiliation". It has also made them question "How should a doctor act in a conflict situation".
This time it is the turn of the film makers to turn their attention to Chhattisgarh.
Hoping you will respond. With warm wishes,
Sudha Bharadwaj, Advocate
on behalf of Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha, and
Chhattisgarh PUCL.
Ajay, who would be about 35, hails originally from Kerala. Coming from a very ordinary family, he has been involved in CPI politics and is still a postbearer of the local youth federation. He learned film-making at "Jan Darshan" an effort of journalist Lalit Surjan (of Deshbandhu fame) to train local youth in the audio-visual media.
As a research assistant of the well known sociologist Jonathan Parry of the London School of Economics, Ajay made several films on the interface of caste and class among the permanent workmen of the Bhilai Steel Plant, which were widely appreciated
As a member of PUCL, he had the courage to accompany several fact finding teams including into fake encounters, and capture on film the statements of victims.(Presumably it is this activity of Ajay's that is being dubbed "sedition"?)
He had started a foundation called "Drk Sakshi" (Eye witness) to make socially relevant films and under this banner he made a number of films for various people's movements and organisations. For instance "Phool Nahi Chingari Hai" a film capturing the 8th March programme of the Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha, and a film on the rich diversity of rice varieties in Chhatisgarh for social organisation Rupantar. Ajay had also made an interesting film on the lathicharge on the Honda workers at Gurgaon in the wider context of liberalisation based on TV footage, which proved invaluable material for educating workers. Just before his arrest he was planning a documentary on displacement.
Ajay also ran an informal education centre for women and children in one of the bastis of Bhilai. This unassuming, sensitive and courageous young man was the much loved "Bhaiyya", and always there for the people of Dabrapara - taking a cancer patient to hospital, intervening on the behalf of the girl children against patriardchal attitudes, helping to deal with insensitive authorities....
In the year 2004 Ajay had accompanied a group of researchers to Dantewada and there his camera was snatched away from him by youthful villagers, possibly frontal organisation members of Maoists. Later an unknown young man came to him and offered that the camera or its cost would be returned and asked him to write down information about the make of the camera and its cost. Ultimately neither the camera nor its cost were returned to him, but it is possibly the seizure of some such letter that forms the flimsy basis that Ajay was the member of a the banned organisation CPI (Maoist). It is pertinent that the Act under which this organisation was banned itself came into existence in April 2006.
Of course the real crime committed by Ajay was that he insisted on standing in solidarity with Binayak Sen even after his arrest. He made a film on Dr. Sen, ironically called "Anjam". In a recent hearing he had been unduly harassed when a pocket knife (cum nail cutter cum corkskrew - one of those handy kits) was found in his rucksack while entering the court. This was splashed in the media as a "weapon"! Interestingly the so-called "incriminating letter" is said to have been seized in January. It took the police 5 months to decide whether or not to book Ajay, there could be no greater evidence that there is no evidence!!
Be that is it may, Ajay is now in a jail. Clearly the Chhattisgarh government is hell bent on clearly giving the message: "Speak about the conditions in Bastar and you go to jail. Of course we know you are not Maoists, but so what .... rot in jail till you prove your innocence!"
And its not only Ajay. The journalists who tried to expose atrocities of the police or Salwa Judum were sacked, bashed up or otherwise threatened. Many TV journalists had their cameras and footage snatched away. Out of the 52 detainees under the Chhattisgarh Act, 2 are journalists.
If you think you can take up the campaign for the release of Ajay, we can send a detailed profile, a list of films and selected CDs etc.
The campaign of doctors in favour of Dr. Binayak Sen has gone far beyond the borders of Chhattisgarh, and even India, and has forced them to think deeply over their Hippocratic Oath which tells them to "treat a patient irrespective of political affiliation". It has also made them question "How should a doctor act in a conflict situation".
This time it is the turn of the film makers to turn their attention to Chhattisgarh.
Hoping you will respond. With warm wishes,
Sudha Bharadwaj, Advocate
on behalf of Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha, and
Chhattisgarh PUCL.
Monday, May 5, 2008
Magic signs as part of the travelling amusement park
These translate to: Mail (?) and Pigeons disappearing. Flowers changing colors. Frying an egg on the head of a girl!
Astrology and weight machine - rolled into one!
This was at the 'Urs' festival in Versova, near the fisheries colony by the beach.
The guy had pre-recorded astrological video messages that he called up from a remote and you step on a weight machine, so you get two 'essential' services at the same time - your forecast and weight! Only in India, no?
Sunday, May 4, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)