Citizen Journ vs Traditional Journ

I've been selected for World Pulse's Voices of the Future web 2.0 training program!

I feel so fortunate to be one of 30 women selected internationally for this unique 5 month mentorship program where we are teamed up one-on-one with a mentor and guided towards our goals! We also learn about citizen journalism and web 2.0 and are teamed up with an 'editorial midwife' (love that title!) who will give me feedback about my writing.

I am so glad that I had the opportunity to set up WAVE and now I am able to participate in all these enabling activities to help me reach higher and achieve more...

Sapna.

Despicable journalism from Aroon Purie, editor of Outlook mag

My comment on Vivek's post below...

Great writing, Vivek. I've been noticing the shameless national media demonising Goa for the sake of ratings. Since I've lived in the US before for 9 years, when I returned in 2005, I noticed how similarly commercial the news media had become.

I think people need to be more vocal to the news channels/ national magazines when they publish outrageous nonsense like this and let them know how shoddy the 'thinking' audience considers their channel/ publication.

As an Indian woman who enjoys the freedom of wearing a bikini on the beach to sunbathe and swim, I find the cover highly offensive, and a cheap ploy to get repressed men to buy a copy.

Personally, what I take away, is a strong argument for community media in Goa... something that I'm working towards and I hope others will join me.

another low for aroon purie

By VM on October 30th, 2010

Just weeks ago, India Today editor Aroon Purie was forced to admit that most of an Editor’s Note was plagiarized. It was another shabby footnote in the steep decline of one of India’s premier media franchises.

But will he apologize for the new low plumbed by his latest Editor’s Note – on Goa – if anything an even more egregious example of irresponsible journalism?

The plagiarism episode was followed by more allegations of the same.But this new episode conclusively demonstrates that facts don’t matter at all to this particular media baron.

All that counts is pure sensationalism, underwritten by a persistent underpinning of xenophobia. Once credible, India Today is now a bottom-feeder, and Purie a tabloid hack (at best).

Goa receives 27 lakh domestic tourists and nearly four lakh foreigners every year, many of whom just stay on.

Here’s the first “fact” thrown out by Purie, and he’s already in a hole he’s going to have difficulty crawling out of. These numbers appear to be pulled out of thin air.

3.1 million tourists per year in Goa?

That’s around twice the population of the state, and vastly inflated over any official statistic available. Who is Purie going to blame for this one? What’s the source? Of course there isn’t any! It’s been made up, plain and simple.

It has now, unfortunately, become the crime capital of India, where a confluence of sex, drugs and mafia has made an underworld industry that is growing faster than tourism.

Crime capital of India? We know from the previous disgrace that Purie almost never writes his own Editor’s Note which is written under his byline. But does he even read it?

Can anyone from Delhi – where only one recent scam (CWG) is alleged to have skimmed off 8000 crores – say this out loud without falling over laughing?

Is Purie even aware of the extreme ridiculousness of someone from Delhi – where 96% of women say they feel at risk every day – calling Goa “unsafe”? It’s beyond shameless!

And Goa’s “underworld industry” is growing faster than tourism? In whose fevered imagination? Is there some data for this? Are there any facts that can be mustered to back up this incredible assertion?

Of course there aren’t! It’s been made up, just like the rest of this shabby excuse for editorial journalism.

Ever since this incredibly skewed and irresponsible Editor’s Note came out around 24 hours ago, I have been asking the people around me in Goa whether they recognize much in it. Of course everyone is aware that lawlessness and gangsterism has become a fact of life on part of the coast, and that there is an ugly politician-criminal nexus – a widespread Indian disease – that is taking hold on state soil.

More than two years ago, I myself wrote in a Time Out Mumbai cover story that “only a huge crackdown can eliminate the drug business that pervades large pockets of the coastline.”

But there is more to this Purie editorial – and the entire scurrilous, deeply dodgy Goa cover story. There is also a persistent strain of xenophobia, underpinned by aggrieved Delhi-style feudal entitlement – as in, “why am I not being treated deferentially in Goa, in the feudal manner that I am accustomed to. How dare these foreigners feel so at home here!”

It is a common, utterly colonialist mentality, and that lack of deference is ultimately the biggest affront to Purie and his ilk.

Look at the cover picture itself – an unremarkable young caucasian woman in an unremarkable two-piece swimsuit. No Goan would even turn his head – the sight implies nothing more to us than a young woman going swimming.

But as we all know, many repressed tourists from the hinterland don’t see anything quite as simple as that. And India Today doesn’t either – it feels quite comfortable plastering the word SEX across this innocuous image, and implying prostitution as well.

This is the ugly stereotype of Indian narrow-mindedness, and here India Today emblazons it right across its front cover.

We have been wondering here at tambdimati.com, how will this girl feel when she sees the cover . Did she “ask for it” by wearing a swimsuit to the beach? Like Delhi girls “ask for it” by merely boarding a bus?

How would Purie feel if it was his daughter pictured in a bikini, with that lurid headline splayed across her legs?

http://www.tambdimati.com/another-low-for-india-today-magazine/

Who Owns the Airwaves?

It's incredible that TV watching has become a national pastime in India but the issue of private companies using public airwaves is hardly discussed. Besides, who knew they were using OUR airwaves for FREE and that too, to broadcast Bollywood news, cricket and political sensationalism! And yes, four-year-old children with make-up dancing like adults on every other channel...

please read this article ''Why Free Spectrum to Private TV

Broadcasters??.'' http://www.friendsofprasarbharati.org/spectrum.htm

Why Free Spectrum to Private TV

Broadcasters??.

By: Joseph Martin CJ & Dipak Dholakia

The Information and Broadcasting Ministry is planning to undertake the exercise to review the entire status of issuing licenses to TV channels. In this connection, the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) asked Indian television broadcasters to give details of their operational status along with the Wireless Planning & Coordination (WPC) licence by 11 June.

The MIB had earlier issued a notice in this regard on 25 March seeking a reply within 15 days. However, the deadline has been extended as most of the channels did not comply with the deadline.

The private television broadcasters attitude of not even responding to the MIB regarding the details of their operational status along with the Wireless Planning & Coordination (WPC) license is absolutely irresponsible and deliberate .

It is to be remembered that the spectrum the private television broadcasters occupy now is valued at thousand of crores of rupees and the private television broadcasters have been allotted the license to use the spectrum without any license fee to the government.

In the historic judgment in 1995 the Supreme Court (Ministry of Information and Broadcasting V/S Cricket Association of West Bengal writ petition ) ruled that air-waves (the spectrum) constitute public property which must be utilised for advancing public good. Since air-waves constitute public property, mobile phone operators and private FM operators pay license fees to the government in its capacity as the custodian of public properties. But Private television broadcasters use these air-waves free of cost. Yet they are not even willing to respond to the government (MIB) regarding their license they hold without paying any money to the government.

Changed Broadcast Scenario: Now Broadcasting is not for serving the nation ,

But only for profit ! , Huge profit.!!

Ideally, broadcast media should provide quality entertainment and useful information that fosters a healthy democracy. But, what is the situation in our country now? Television Broadcasting has now become an industry and day by day new entrants are joining the race with the sole motive of profit by reaping the benefits of consumerist culture, spread by the media, encouraged by the media and exploited by the media, after the globalisation and liberalisation of Indian economy.

In the recent years, broadcasters have increasingly elevated financial interests above the public interest. Now most of our Broadcast media exist only to generate huge profit . It is a well accepted truth that crime shows, sex shows and similar shows had many more viewers than other shows on news channels. Advertisers went by the number of viewers when advertising on channels.

Today television channels are making fast money by cashing on the news in the wrong sense and the wrong way. In the race to become more popular and make money they have broken all the limits media must follow while serving to build a healthy and progressive society. They have no respect for the sentiments and ethics of the people and country they purportedly serve. With their immense power to influence the masses they just make judgment like a true dictator rather than give a good advice like a true friend as they are supposed to do. If this is going to continue in future, the people will have to think about the role of media in their lives.

Air-waves that belong to public property cannot be allowed to exploited by private television broadcasters for profit only ,with out even paying the spectrum fee or the so called license fee..

In this changed broadcasting scenario in our country, FRIENDS OF PRASAR BHARATI appeals to the policy makers of this country to reconsider the existing system of allocating Broadcast license and the valuable spectrum to private television broadcasters , without paying license fee for the spectrum they are using for broadcast free of coast . FRIENDS OF PRASAR BHARATI requests the government to charge license fee from the private television broadcasters for the valuable spectrum they are using now. Now other than private television broadcasters all other spectrum users are paying huge license fee to the government for the spectrum they are using.

The spectrum is a valuable and scarce National resource

Electromagnetic Spectrum is a major asset to any nation. It is a great National asset .For example in a developed country like United Kingdom (UK), it contributes about 2-3% of its GDP. The government should consider that spectrum pricing is a tool which should be applied to all broadcasters to promote the most efficient use of spectrum and for resource mobilisation for the nation. It must not be allowed to be warehoused or wasted. Since spectrum is a national resource, the public must be compensated for its use by its operators . Auctions are one source of payment. Meaningful public interest obligations and user fees are two other ways of paying for use of this public good.

Recently nine telecom players, including BSNL, MTNL, Bharti, Vodafone and RCom, paid Rs 67,719 crore ,(US$15 billion, at Rs. 45 to a dollar) to the government towards 3G spectrum that was auctioned, against the government's original expectation of Rs. 35,000 crore (US$7.78 billion). In U.K. the government raised £22.5 billion (US$34 billion) for five 3G licenses when it was auctioned in year 2000.

Broadband Wireless Access auction fetched the Government Rs. 28,566 crore as on Friday 05-06-2010 and it is expected to increase in the further rounds of auction. Now the Government seems determined to take the spectrum revenue to more than Rs.One lakh crore from 3G auction & Broadband Wireless spectrum auction.

Direct-to-home (DTH) television operators are paying 10% of their gross revenue to the government as license fee for the spectrum they use.

The government earned Rs. 908 crore as one time entry fee (OTEF) from private FM operators from the phase two of the FM in which government allocated 280 radio licenses to private operators in addition to the annual revenue sharing at the rate of 4% of the annual revenue for the year or the 10% of the one time entry fee (OTEF) for the concerned city. In phase one, the government earned Rs .155 Crore.

The licences and the spectrum (2G) allotted in 2007 to nine operators at a price of Rs 1,650 crore (Rs 16.50 billion) per operator. This price was not taken on the basis of the 2007 market value but on the basis of an auction held in 2001. Under the licence agreement with the department of telecommunication, GSM operators are entitled to spectrum up to 6.2 MHz while CDMA operators have been permitted spectrum up to 5 MHz. The regulator TRAI had suggested on 11 May 2010 that, telecom operators with 2G spectrum of more than 6.2MHz should pay a one-time fee based on the price of 3G spectrum as per the recent auction.

The most valuable spectrum is below 1 GHz, where the frequencies combine the characteristics of coverage and capacity that make it particularly suitable for a wide range of applications. Broadcasters currently uses most of the spectrum below 1 GHz.

A channel requires 1.5 to 2 MHz bandwidth with MPEG4 compression format & 2.0 to 4.0 MHz with MPEG 2 compression format . The band width requirement of a channel also depends on the content it carries. Channels carrying fast moving picture like sports , movie , infotainment requires more bandwidth as compared to those channels which have slow moving pictures like news , shopping, religious etc.

In a country where 3G spectrum is valued at around RS. 70,000 crore, how can the country accommodate the growing number of TV channels without enforcing valuable spectrum charge as license fee?.

Bring broadcasters in line with other spectrum users


But the Television broadcasters have not paid any spectrum fee to the government for the spectrum they are using. The fact that those who oppose financial assistance to Prasar Bharati and want it to face competition from the market and demands AIR& DD to generate 50% of the operating expense, forget the fact that the private television broadcasters have been given undeserving huge financial benefit in the form of free usage of air-waves, and yet they charge fee from the people to the tune of Rs. 2000 to 3000 per annum!.

Also, PRASAR BHARATI provides a free DTH platform to the citizens of this country in addition to its free channels. A campaign needs to be carried on to make the private television broadcasters pay the spectrum fee (the license fee) for the spectrum they using.

At the time of promulgation of Prasar Bharati Act, the then government had promised a comprehensive Broadcast Bill. According to the draft of the Broadcast Bill 1997 (which didn't get passed till date), the television broadcasters need to pay the license fees as may be determined by the regulator.

While the need for a Broadcasting Bill has been talked about since 1997, it was only in 2006 that the UPA Government with previous Union Information & Broadcasting Minister Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi brought out the draft for the Broadcasting Services Regulation Bill. The Bill, said the I&B Ministry, will regulate the broadcast services with several private TV channels.

But strangely, consciously and unfortunately, the license fee portion has been removed from the draft of the Broadcast Bill 1997 when it was modified and redrafted in 2006. It may be recalled that the private broadcasters were unanimous in opposing the proposed Broadcast Bill in the name of freedom of expression. The real opposition, it can now be conjectured, was on the issue of the license fee which however, never came to light during the hot debates on various channels. For our readers to verify the original provision of license fee and the quiet removal of it we hereby are giving the link to both Broadcast Bill 1997 and Broadcast Bill 2007 in the annexure of this article.

The spectrum war is not limited to the telecom space alone; it has spilled over to the broadcasting sector as well. With close to 512 TV channels being beamed into India, and over 152 more waiting in the queue, the government has asked the regulator – TRAI -- whether there Is a need to cap the number of channels in the context of scarce spectrum availability.

Earlier, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) had asked the Information and Broadcasting Ministry to vacate some of the lower C band spectrum, that can be used by telcos.

It is believed that the I&B letter to TRAI followed a series of written complaints from MPs on several "erratic" channels whose seriousness in the media business was being doubted. It may be mentioned here that capping the number of service providers has been a contentious issue in the telecom sector also. And, despite the scarcity of spectrum, a cap on the number of telcos was not imposed. But, recently, the government said that no new application would be entertained beyond a specified cut-off date.

In a related development, I&B minister Ambika Soni has written to Home Minister P. Chidambaram and some chief ministers, expressing her concern on cable operators showing illegal and unregistered TV channels. Many of these channels are operating without any permission from the ministry of home affairs, thereby risking the law and order situation of the country .

It goes with out telling that the rules for approving new TV channels are not stringent enough in India. If not, how could persons / companies with no media exposures ,but with money (of course, black) just wanting to drive on the media wagon could get easy new TV channel approvals ? The result is, there are so many mediocre TV channels today that even their owners don’t see them (we have channels for all major Political Parties, political leaders, religious groups etc. etc ,).

I&B ministry has put forth many questions to TRAI regarding regulation of TV channels. They are:

Should there be a five-year commitment from broadcasters for running channels to assess the seriousness of the players;

Should financial viability of the broadcaster be made more rigid so that entry becomes that much tougher;

Should experience of the applicant in the media business be made mandatory for opening channels;

What should be the maximum number of satellite channels that can be permitted;

Should there be an amendment in the unlinking / down linking clause?


So, the final answer on limiting the number of TV channels and imposing other regulations lies in the hands of TRAI and the ministry of information & broadcasting. In this scenario it is quite logical to auction the much valued Television Broadcast Spectrum just like the way the other spectrum users (Telecom operators, Private FM operators , Mobile television operators, Direct-to-home (DTH) television operators, Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) operators ) have been allotted the spectrum.

It should be made mandatory even for the existing Broadcasters to pay the spectrum fees, a one-time levy on existing private television Broadcasters comparable with the price, that can be discovered in the future auction for television broadcast spectrum as the benchmark or some percentage of the gross revenue of the broadcasters as in the case of DTH and private FM broadcasters.

annexure :

a) Broadcast bill 1977 http://www.friendsofprasarbharati.org/bb1977.htm

b) Broadcast bill 2007 http://www.friendsofprasarbharati.org/bbill2007.pdf

The Shiv Sena bullies are back!

I went to a Christian school, was converted to Catholicism (my mother's religion), kept my original Hindu name. I remember celebrating all religious holidays - Holi and Id, with my friends of all faiths. We didn't have to attend schools on these days.

I also disagree with allowing kids to wear their bangles/ bindis. The idea of a 'uniform' is that all kids come in to the classroom looking the same, and being equal.

Why don't the self-righteous Hindutva councilors spend their time improving the infrastructure of Hindu schools so that they would have equal prominence as Christian schools in Bombay?

As long as Hindu kids studying at Christian schools don't get the idea that Christianity is superior to Hinduism, let's leave politics out of the classroom, for Godssake (pun intended).

Christian schools balk at Hinduism directive

Published Date: May 26, 2010
By Priscilla Pinto, Mumbai

Church officials are hotly disputing a new directive that Christian
schools should follow Hindu traditions and culture more closely.

The Brihanmumbai (Greater Mumbai) Municipal Corporation passed a
resolution on May 18, calling on Christian schools to give holidays
for Hindu religious festivals and to allow girls to wear bangles and
the traditional bindi on their foreheads. The resolution also states
that school board seats should be automatically offered to elected
councilors.

The corporation is dominated by two pro-Hindu groups, Shiv Sena and
the Bharatiya Janata Party. The chair of its Education Committee,
Rukmini Kharatmol, insists that Catholic schools who seek government
funding should follow Hindu traditions, as most students in them are
Hindus.

Father Gregory Lobo, secretary of the Bombay Archdiocesan Board of
Education, which coordinates 150 Catholic schools around the city,
says most of their schools do give days off for important Hindu
festivals and allow girls to wear the bindi and bangles. But he went
on to add that “the corporation has no jurisdiction over our schools
and only the state education department can issue instructions.”

Joseph Dias, general secretary of the Catholic Secular Forum, went
further by saying his group “will not tolerate interference” and may
seek legal counsel.

Dolphy D’Souza, president of the Bombay Catholic Sabha, dismissed the
directions as a political gimmick and warned that Catholics could take
to the streets if the corporation fails to withdraw them.